User:Soukenik.3/sandbox

Article Evaluation:

The suggested edits to be made to the topic of "At-Risk students," were easily applicable to the topic of choice, yet there were some disagreements on including the term "alternative schools." There was a lot of discussion attempting to determine which populations should be included, how these populations should be described, and what sources are reliable. There are viewpoints and subtopics that are overrepresented, and have the intent to maintain a fairly neutral opinion, but that seems debatable. The page as a whole was deleted, but the discussion in regards to edits made to this page were saved. The discussion page logged "misuse," edits and deletions due this misuse. The article was rated a C, when it existed in regards to quality. I think what really lacked for this page was a proper understanding of "at-risk students," with out incorporating personal biased of what an "at-risk student" exemplifies. There is significant discussion for making large changes and edits but without consensus.

~