User:SoyGabrielacantu/Hillsong Church/Pasillas21 Peer Review

General info
SoyGabrielacantu
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:SoyGabrielacantu/Hillsong Church
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Hillsong Church

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * I would suggest that a Lead is added on the editing portion.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * The edits describe sources. I would come up with an introduction to add to the edit.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Not yet.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Not yet.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * I would add a paragraph or some additions from the sources that you found.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * I'm unsure since the topic is about a Church.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Once you add the "controversy points" make sure to keep it factual and neutral rather than opinionated.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Not yet.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * N/A
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * The content is mainly just sources and what she wants to write about.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, great sources.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes. I noticed that one source is from a Hulu show. I would take important information from that and write it in your article.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes, there is a variety or source options such as a tv show, a Time article, and a Youtube link.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Possibly. I would look into the Wiki source links and gather further information.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, but so far there is only sources and ideas.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Some punctuation missing after documentary in the 3rd source list.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Not yet.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * No media included.



Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * The draft has great sources. I would recommend building your ideas and writing content to support the Wiki article. Start with a list of topics and narrow down what you would like to include.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Content is still in draft.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Yes.