User:SpaceCat13/Putana (volcano)/SpaceCat13 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Zanvit


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Olca sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Olca

Lead
It's unclear what your lead is in your sandbox, but the lead for the main article seems good. There needs to be a citation for every idea or factual statement. Usually that means every sentence has a citation, even in the lead.

Content
The content is good. It can be a bit technical and hard to follow sometimes. The sections included in the main article are good. Remember to make the article accessible to the average reader.

Tone and Balance
I think the information is very fact-driven and there is little bias in the article at all.

Sources and References
Adding additional references strengthens the article. It's always good to have more and to include some that aren't scientific journal articles. Try including more generalized website sources from reputable places so someone without access to a database of journals can still learn more.

Organization
I think the subsections are a good idea and help organize the information.

Images and Media
The additional image is always helpful. Try adding a map image that could provide geographical context.

Overall Impressions
I think this is a good contribution to the article for this volcano. The article is a bit heavy on jargon and technical information. Try to include general terms and summary results. Also include more information about why this volcano is unique and deserves its own Wikipedia page. Overall, it's a good start to this article!