User:SpacemanSpiff/FAR

India articles that should go through FAR

Chola dynasty

 * Heavily reliant on older sources and doesn't consider more recent scholarly consensus
 * Some unreferenced content, a lot of it placed before sources that aren't connected (get examples)
 * Use of sources such as whatisindia.com
 * Unreferenced stuff around culture/religion
 * Spot checking Ref 24 -- seems a bit odd, the link doesn't support it, but that isn't to say it's wrong

Western Ganga Dynasty

 * Doesn't reflect mainstream sources, and sources are cherry picked
 * SYNTH concerns too as disparate sources are joined to form conclusions
 * Some close paraphrasing concerns (check for examples)