User:Sparklejumpropequeenn/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Social justice

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it defines the title of the course that I am taking, so it is relevant to me and I would like to learn more about it.

Evaluate the article
In the lead section of this article, the introductory sentence clearly explains what social justice is in sufficient detail. This section is very concise, and it lays out an outline for every topic discussed in the article, including history, different theories, and social movements. The article's content fully relates to the topic, and it includes both modern and historical information. There is no content missing or content that doesn't belong, and the topics discussed in this article are not underrepresented as they are often taught in schools. This article is neutral through most of the sections, as they are merely factual. However, the criticism section of this article is heavily biased as it outlines the author's criticism of different views on social justice. Thus, some of the article ends up having a slightly persuasive tone, and minority viewpoints are not explicitly labeled as such. This article is backed my ample references and sources. The sources are current, thorough, and diverse. However, some of the links to the sources no longer work. This article references many different types of sources, so I do not think that extra sources are necessary. The article is well-written, easy to understand, organized, and it has little to no grammatical errors. The article contains images of the historical context described in the text. These images help the reader understand the history. Most of the images are available to the public domain, yet some are copyrighted. These images, however, are properly cited. This article is heavily criticized in the talk page. Many parts of the article have been changed, such as their opening sentence and uncited paragraphs. Wikipedia rates this article as B-class, and it is involved in many WikiProjects. Overall, Wikipedia critiques this article in a harsher manner than we typically do in class, yet it discusses topics such as citations just like we would. To conclude, I believe that the content of this article is overall pretty good, yet I would edit the criticism section to make it less biased. I think that this article is fully-developed, and the explanation of the history of social justice is clear, yet I might make it a bit more concise.