User:Sparrowman980/Archive3

sorry
I just meant to undo the ref tag as it was blanking the first few sentences of the article. I moved i into the infobox but that made it worse. The number itself is fine. TransUtopian 04:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

2007 Glasgow International Airport attack
hi hi. i don't think this article should be semi-protected quite yet. i don't see a serious amount of vandalism, and i do see some valuable contributions from IPs. would you consider unprotecting it for a bit? JoeSmack Talk 06:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * thank you! :) JoeSmack Talk 06:49, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * did you take that photo yourself? what did you see?Rolf Mayo 08:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Carfireterro.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Carfireterro.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Bennyhill1.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bennyhill1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyrights
Hello. I noticed you have claimed ownership of a few images you have uploaded, including some obvious screenshots and DVD covers. Rather than listing them all here, I'm just going to tag them for deletion, and explain that grabbing a screenshot does not establish ownership of copyright. If you think any of your images could qualify for fair use, you should add detailed rationales. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Carfireterro.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Carfireterro.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 00:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:VikingSerenade.JPG
Hello again. What is the source of this image please? -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nick tate.jpg
Who owns the copyright to this video please. -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Your case
Hello. I am not all over your case - I am resolving a number of copyright infringements. -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Glasgow
You clearly don't understand how images are used on Wikipedia, but I guess I'll let you keep the image there for a few days before it gets deleted. Please be careful more when reverting, though:. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 17:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use and Bill Cosby
Hello. Please read up on copyright law and what constitutes Fair Use. This logo is not fair use in this article. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bennyhill1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bennyhill1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 17:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:507287_356x237.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:507287_356x237.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 17:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleting notices
If you have a problem with deletion nominations, please explain your reasoning by following the links in the template. Do not blank deletion notice templates. This is considered vandalism, and you can be blocked. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 17:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:VikingSerenade.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:VikingSerenade.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 17:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Playboyjazzfestival19792007.gif
I have tagged Image:Playboyjazzfestival19792007.gif as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 17:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nick_tate.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nick_tate.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 17:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Carfireterro.jpg
I have tagged Image:Carfireterro.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bleh999 18:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:BillCosby1.gif
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:BillCosby1.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:BillCosby1.gif is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:BillCosby1.gif itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Funeral Pyre
I didn't speedily delete this article, because in my opinion, it has sufficient context to make the subject clearly understandable, and a plausible assertion of notability. You're still welcome to pursue deletion for it through AfD, if you like. -FisherQueen (Talk) 05:25, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:244.rush.geoffrey.101006.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:244.rush.geoffrey.101006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

A suggestion about your talk page
It isn't our custom to just blank our talk pages, but nobody likes a talk page that's unnecessarily long, either. Many Wikipedians create archives of their old discussions, so they can keep the talk page clear without making old discussions disappear completely. Check out my talk page for an example of what that looks like; you'll find instructions on how to do it at WP:ARCHIVE, or feel free to just steal code off of my talk page, if you like. I hope this helps. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:244.rush.geoffrey.101006.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:244.rush.geoffrey.101006.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bleh999 20:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:244.rush.geoffrey.101006.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:244.rush.geoffrey.101006.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 01:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:507287_356x237.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:507287_356x237.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 01:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

l

Image copyright problem with Image:Hamilton_Mitchell.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hamilton_Mitchell.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Mulcahy2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mulcahy2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:800px-A340600JM.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:800px-A340600JM.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 20:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

User subpage
I have moved your page of userboxes and flags to User:Sparrowman980/facts, and I have deleted User:Sparrowman980facts and User:Sparrowman980 facts. When creating new pages in the user namespace, we always use subpages &mdash; please see Subpages for more information. Thanks. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 20:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pawlogo.jpg
I retagged it using instead of.  bibliomaniac 1 5  BUY NOW! 05:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Umm...are you sure about that?  bibliomaniac 1 5  BUY NOW! 05:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Brainstormers.  bibliomaniac 1 5  BUY NOW! 20:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:244.rush.geoffrey.101006.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:244.rush.geoffrey.101006.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 08:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:111167569 13f705dd00.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:111167569 13f705dd00.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 16:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright issues and removing deletion notices from images
Hi, perhaps you'd like to read up on our image policies at Media copyright questions. As it stands, however, no image is considered public domain unless it is explicitly released as such by the author - this means even promotional images.

Also, could you please stop removing deletion notices from pages without fixing the problem:. If you need to, you can go to the image help page listed above. Thanks. The Evil Spartan 16:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:244.rush.geoffrey.101006.jpg
The image you uploaded, Image:244.rush.geoffrey.101006.jpg, has been deleted as a copyright infringement falling under the criteria for speedy deletion (I4, I6 and I7) as well as the image deletion process. If you continue to disrespect copyright laws, policies, or processes, or continue to remove deletion notices from media listed for deletion, you can be blocked from editing. If you would like explanation of how copyright works, feel free to ask either me, or another admin or other editor, or at Media copyright questions. Please note that since this is a free content encyclopaedia, copyright is taken seriously. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
A tag has been placed on Episode 7: Gulf War 1991, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Z1720 07:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Episode 8: Middle East 1973, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Z1720 07:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop posting text copied from other websites
Hi, you appear to have been around here long enough to know that posting text from other websites is not permitted. Please take another look at WP:C before creating any more articles. Episode 1: 1968 Vietnam and the others you created are copied verbatim from the show's website. Thanks. -- But | seriously | folks   07:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Vietnam175.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vietnam175.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  But | seriously | folks   07:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Uploading fair use images of living persons
Please stop uploading fair use images of living persons. You've been asked multiple times, and been made privy to the policy (WP:FU - #8) on multiple occasions. You've been around here long enough to know better. Please stop, not only with this, but with all copyright issues. If not, I'll have to leave a note at WP:ANI. The Evil Spartan 16:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:BritishairwaysConcorde.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:BritishairwaysConcorde.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 22:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pawlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pawlogo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 22:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop uploading images
I am here to request that you stop uploading images altogether for a while. The number of problems you are havimg w.r.t. images is far too high. Giving it a rest for a while will give people (including you) the chance to deal with the problematic images you have already uploaded.Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Vietnam175.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vietnam175.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

General Motors Edit-Corporate Restructuring-Quell The Stock Market
Corporate Restructuring Section: Sentence: The Federal Reserve in a move to quell the stock market The Federal Reserve does not base its actions on the stock market. It did not increase interest rates to quell the stock market but to keep inflation risks contained. The interest rate increases may have quelled the stock market, but the Federal Reserve does not increase interest rates just to quell the stock market. If that were the case, then in 2007 the stock market should have been quelled from the Fed increasing rates from a low of 1% to its current 5.25%. The purpose of the Federal Reserve is rooted in the economy and monetary policy, not stock market gyrations.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/pf/pf.htm

General Motors 'Largest Car Manufacturer'
While the old version (which you restored it to) may be 'simple and sweet', it has the following problems:

The figures — and sales growth rates — indicate that Toyota could overtake GM as the No. 1 automaker Please note that it says 'could overtake', not 'has overtaken'. It clearly states the sales volume from last year, which supports with hard data that GM is largest by annual production.
 * It is incorrect. Rankings of size are determined by annual production volume, and is not determined until the end of the year, as stated in the referenced article.
 * No citation. Nowhere in the article referenced will you find any mention of sales revenue, only sales volume.
 * As a compromise to those who point out that GM has fallen behind this year, I feel it is fair to include sales volume for the current year, which can be updated as the year progresses. This is NPOV, whereas excluding one or the other could be seen as taking one side or the other.
 * Both pieces of data are relevant and important, and neither should be dismissed, especially when the one that IS being dismissed is the standard by which the title is determined.
 * General Motors still claims the title of largest automaker themselves, see GM Corporate Information. I have yet to see anything from Toyota themselves that claims they are 'largest', most likely because they also accept that full-year production is the standard by which those claims are made.
 * Even in the referenced article states:

Should you choose to change it to 'largest by sales revenue', I think it would be reasonable to request a source both for that information and that such a title is an accepted standard by which to judge the size of an automaker.--Scottr76 02:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: General Motors/External Links/Soapbox
I believe the exteranl link I provided was to the General Motors discussion page, not the main article. As for soapbox, I try to stick to the facts in articles. It is a known fact that the United States Federal Reserve does not base its decisions on the stock market. There is nothing political about that statement or the changes I made to the article. The external link I posted on the General Motors Talk Page should provide you and other Wikipedia users the opportunity to learn more about the what the Federal Reserve bases interest rate increases on. I would hope that when a user edits an article they are aware of correct factual changes that have been done before reverting to a previously posted article. To do that would erase any beneficial changes that had been made since that posting. Surely Wikipedia's founders did not intend for teenage users to edit articles completely based on one user's incorrect edits, ignoring the correct contributions of many Wikipedia users to undo for the mistakes of one user edit. No soapbox about it. No politics. Just the facts.

Jason Earles
Please contribute to the discussion about whether or not we should show his age in talk:Jason Earles. Thanks. --NrDg 21:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: your edit summary. The problem we have is not that we don't have proper cites, we have at least 4 that meet the requirements of good secondary sources. And a primary source we have chosen not to use. The problem is they all conflict with each other. We have good cites for each of 30, 22 and now 19. And a primary source that says 30. We know he is 30, that is not in real dispute, but we are not allowed to make conclusions by Wiki policy. So what do we do? --NrDg 21:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Yep, that is it in a nutshell. He's 30, but it would require citing OR to decisively and permanently resolve the matter. On top of that, we have BLP rules to take into consideration, and the notion that zero information is preferable to false or misleading information. So the whole discussion is about how we can best deal with incorrect statements about his age without violating BLP or making our content misleading. Poindexter Propellerhead 01:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

G.I. Joe
Please be more careful when copy editing articles, such as the one at G.I. Joe. Destro is the correct character name, not Destroy. "Harkened" back means that something looks or goes back to some time in the past; hardened is not correct. "G.I. Joe's" is not correct, as the plural version of nouns in English do not use an apostrophe. And most of your other changes are unnecessary -- canceled is a variant of cancelled, and both are correct, for example. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 00:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Playboy Jazz Festival
That's not right. It's called the "Playboy Jazz Festival," it's held in LA, but it's not called the "Los Angeles Playboy Jazz Festival." It's an unnecessary disambiguation at best, and misleading at worst.

And as for the dates, it's not necessarily held on the 19th and 20th. The 2007 Jazz Festival was on the 16th and 17th, the 2006 festival was on the 17th and 18th, the 2005 festival was on the 11th and 12th, and so on. &mdash; Rebelguys2 <sup style="color:#CC5500;">talk 22:14, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Courage the Cowardly Dog
Please be more careful here. I don't know why you would take out the correct link to Arthur Anderson, and curses is correct style when we link to a plural form of an article title.

Additionally, the show hasn't "returned" &mdash; it's simply being syndicated. The fourth season of the show ran through 2007, and I see no indication that its presence on Cartoon Network now is anything but syndication. &mdash; Rebelguys2 <sup style="color:#CC5500;">talk 22:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Lucky number 49 22:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Lucky number 49 22:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Your recent revert was determined to be unconstructive, restoring deliberate falsehoods, removing a needed template, and causing links to be directed to the wrong page, among other issues. Lucky number 49 22:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Got a problem
Following your contributions is not harassment when I only do so for the purposes of "checking up on an editor to fix errors or violations of Wikipedia policy." Please see our behavioral guideline at Harassment. Thanks. &mdash; Rebelguys2 <sup style="color:#CC5500;">talk 22:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

No personal attacks
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. &mdash; Rebelguys2 <sup style="color:#CC5500;">talk 22:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Blanking talk pages
Please don't delete things from my talk page, as you did here. I prefer to keep things visible so I can refer back to them at a future date, if needed. Thanks. &mdash; Rebelguys2 <sup style="color:#CC5500;">talk 22:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC) </BR> </BR>Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Sandbox for test edits. Lucky number 49 22:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please do not archive recent warnings. Warnings exist both to inform you, and other editors visiting your page; removing recent ones disrupts the editing process. Lucky number 49 22:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

I never Blanked any page that was yous i tried to restore it Sparrowman980 01:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


 * You did here, but OK, whatever. &mdash; Rebelguys2 <sup style="color:#CC5500;">talk 01:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Archiving
Please review WP:ARCHIVE and WP:REFACTOR. Archiving a talk page, including your own is acceptable practice when it becomes too large, not to hide immediate vandalism warnings. Lucky number 49 02:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)