User:SpartRL/Equilibrant force/CStark10 Peer Review

1)     What was the most interesting/informative part of the draft?

I really enjoyed how you are incorporating a word problem example, demonstrating how to determine the equilibrant force of acting forces. I find that this is very useful information for people who might potentially look towards Wikipedia articles to help with understanding the correct approach to equilibrant force problems.

2)     What are you most interested in but not fulfilled?

This one is tough to answer now because the choices you are making, I feel are great in respect to the article you have chosen. If I had to suggest anything maybe add some historical references (hyperlinks or subsections) to those that brought the concepts of equilibrant forces to physics and mathematics.

3)     Is there a new subsection that you think might need to be added?

As stated above in question 2. It would be nice to see some historical recognition to the mathematicians that made this specific physics concept possible in terms of understanding it, applying it, and bringing forth the rules of math that justify it. Could be a “History” subsection.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)