User:Spectral099/Chromosome abnormality/Ig510 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * For this peer review I will be looking at @Spectral099
 * I will be looking at User:Spectral099/Chromosome abnormality

Lead

 * There dosen't seem to be any edits for the lead.
 * The article starts be defining what a Chromosome abnormality so it right away getting into the topic.
 * The lead is followed by the table of content but the lead itself only defines chromosome abnormality.
 * The lead lays a basic background of what a chromosome abnormality is where as the rest of the article digs deeper into aspects of chromosome abnormalities.
 * For such a complicated topic the lead seems concise and tries to give the basics so the rest of the reading is a little bit more understandable.

Content

 * The content that is being added is relevant to adding some vocabulary and is making the article more readable.
 * Yes the content added is information that has to do with the topic.
 * The edits show that there is a section that can be removed and some words moved around so it is making the article more readable and less complicated.
 * As the editor mentioned the concepts should be evenly talked about so there needs to be a balance of either some sections being longer or some sections being cut down.

Tone and Balance

 * The content that is added is neutral because it is making the reading, easier to read and is contributing ti the balance of the article.
 * The edits don't present any claim because they are just rewording some parts to make them easier to understand.
 * The balance could use some work but the edits seem to be doing a good job on establishing a balance.
 * There is no persuasion it is only informational sections.

Sources and References

 * Yes the added information presents already supported information just with different wording.
 * The sources are well put and directly connect to other informational pages.
 * the sources are produced by people that come from similar felids of study do to the scientific nature of the topic.
 * The links are functional

Organization

 * the content added and taken away is well though out and establishes the reader an easier task to read the article.
 * The content is grammatically sound.
 * The content added is well organized and benefits the organization of the article as a whole.

Overall impressions

 * The content added helps the article be more balance with all the information that is presented and the readability of the information.
 * The strengths is that they are making the article less complicated to understand.