User:Spehizle

University student who has done enough citation work to know when a source is woefully lacking. While I myself do not intend to add much in the way of hard facts and solid claims, (I wouldn't presume, considering I do not hold anything above a bachelor's degree,) I feel I am competent enough to edit some language, (diction and syntax mainly, without altering the stated facts of the original poster,) and to run down a source, checking if it is worthy. I will not make drastic alterations or deletions unless there is a flagrant and laughable offense to citation, (like citing an amateur blog post, for example.)

Feel free to leave suggestions, helpful hints, or scathing criticism. I will be happy to reply in kind.