User:Speka3/Pain management/Gadishu Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Samantha Peka (Speka3))
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Speka3/Pain_management/Gadishu_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It's very consise and easy to follow

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, she adds different forms of treatment that are not typically thought of. People usally only think of pharmaceutical treatments.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Not really
 * Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Not at all
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? nope she just lists different options of therapeutic treatment

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes, they are fairly current
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Yes
 * Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? N/A
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they do!

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes,
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I only spotted one
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I would say so, yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The approaches she listed are especially informative since they may not be typically thought of when addressing pain management, compared to the use of pharmaceutical treatments
 * How can the content added be improved? I recommend using the entire word for headers rather than abbreviations