User:Spencerladner/Legacy pollution/Daniellleee0982 Peer Review

Clarity

The article is very concise and accurately explains the topic of legacy pollution. Each section of the article explaining the types of cites where legacy pollutants occur are also concise and accurately explain the topic within the first few sentences.

Structure

The article is well structured but I believe there should be section the discusses and focuses on the environment impacts of legacy pollutants. This section should also include the health hazards as well. They were mentioned briefly in other sections but it’s an important topic to discuss. One strength of the article is that it goes into detail the different sites where legacy pollution is occurring.

Balanced

The article is well balanced. It does not get off topic while examining the effects of the different types of cited where legacy pollutants occur. It is well written and easy to read. The article flows through the different information discussed in each section.

Neutrality

The article is written in a neutral way. The article does not try to convince the reader of opinion. It explains the significance of legacy pollution and that it is major problem without being bias.

Sources

The sources are reliable and credible. The sources consist of current relevant information about the topic. The sources are from recent years research so it is up to date. All the images are referenced. The sources are diverse, some discuss the legal aspects of the sites and others discuss the environment impacts and climate change.