User:Spencerqolney/Descender (Comic)/Joereadel Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * User:Spencerqolney
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Spencerqolney/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead
The lead section is concise, but it might benefit from some description of the plot and info on the background (as per the model article)

The lead section might benefit from including a reference to the television adaptation.

Content
The content is well written, but it might be helpful to include the complete plot in the plot summary section. This seems like a huge task because there are 32 issues. The model article does a few broad sentences for each volume, so that's one way to do it.

The background and critical reception section is great. It includes a lot of relevant links and sources that support the text.

Tone and balance
The tone and balance are what one would expect from a Wikipedia article. The content is neutral and there are no biases that I could find.

Organization
The content is concise and easy to read, save for the sentence "The series ran for a total of 32 issues, with the final issue of the series was released on July 25, 2018.", which would benefit from a rewrite.

New article stuff
The article meets Wikipedia's notability requirements.

The source list is fairly exhaustive, and it uses scholarly and news articles.

The article follows the pattern of other similar articles for the most part, but it doesn't include any images or a character list.

The article links to a few different Wikipedia pages, which makes it more discoverable.

Overall impressions
The article is well written and concise, but it could be improved by adding images, character lists, and a more in-depth plot summary.