User:Spencerqolney/Descender (Comic)/MichelleCHsfsu Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Spencerqolney


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Decsender (Comic)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Lead
The lead explains who made the comic and released it, but I suggest including a brief description of the plot. It should also mention the TV Adaptation.

Content
The plot seems brief for a comic that ran for 32 issues. A suggestion would be to add more details to the plot like critical events, story changes, etc.

The background and critical reception look good.

The television adaptation should include some sentences on its reception/response from critics, reviews, audience, etc.

Tone and Balance
The whole draft appears to be in a neutral tone.

Sources and References
The sources and references used are up-to-date and relevant to the article. All links are working.

Organization
The draft is clear and concise. There are minor grammatical errors. All topics are within their subheading, which provides a clear understanding.

Images and Media
There are no images or media, but I do suggest including at least one.

New Article
The article does meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. There is a good amount of references and sources for the subject. The article does follow the model page that is listed. There are links to other Wikipedia articles that can make it more noticeable.

Overall Impression
Overall, the article seems to be straightforward and easy to understand. It can be improved by adding more information to the plot, a response to the tv adaptation, and an image. Other than those three suggestions, it is a good article.