User:Spokane1999/TikTok/Nathanjlyttle Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Spokane1999


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Spokane1999/TikTok


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * TikTok

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is good. Concise and shows the edits provided. I see this has already been peer reviewed before and it says things have changed due to a prior peer review.

Content is definitely neutral with an authoritative tone. Everything is recent and sourced with secondary sources.

As for tone and balance, it is great. One thing I would add, is that when you refer to President Trump as "Trump" and refer to President Biden as "President Biden" shortly after you could possibly come off as unbalanced. In the actual article, you say Trump and a prior contributor used President Biden shortly after. I know it wasn't your contribution, but people read these articles as one fluid work and that could be one chink in the armor.

Things are really well-written and easy to read.

I did not see any media added. At least none was in the sandbox when I looked.

Good quality. Article is more complete and this was a sprawling article that could be daunting to find a place to add content, but you found some good stuff. Really my only tiny nitpick is referring to the presidents so closely together with different titles.