User:Spongeboop/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Stereoisomerism

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this article to evaluate because it provides information on a recently covered topic in class, stereoisomerism. It goes into depth on various terms and has definitions and references supporting each of the statements written.

Evaluate the article
The article had a concise and clear introductory sentence. The lead article provided hint at what it was going to go over, being isomers, however it did not clearly state it.

Every section related to the different isomers that exist, defining each one separately, and the article did not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations.

The article is very neutral, in no way does the article attempt to sway the reader, and presents all the information in a very black/white manner.

Article is very organized, well-written, concise and easy to digest. It is helpful that the sections are all the different isomers, helping with the overall organization. The article also does not have any grammatical/spelling errors.

The article has several images scattered throughout it, and they are all visually appealing. The only issue is that perhaps an image would be better alongside each section instead, readers would then more easily be able to visualize the new definitions.

Most of the discussions are older, but they involve changing the definition that was originally there for stereoisomers. Talk page is also very organized, and other users added information on stereochemistry in real life or instead made their opinions on classifications that may have been overlapping.

Overall, the article was well-developed, heavily researched and efficient at providing information. One minor thing that could be done to enhance the article was additional pictures for each new definition of an isomer.