User:Sprousm/Malo (jellyfish)/Ejdegiacomo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sprousm


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sprousm/Malo (jellyfish)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The introduction provides a clear statement on what the organism is as well as it's family and phylum. It does not go into too much detail and does not consist of any information that is not talked about in the rest of the article.

Content: The content is relevant and also describes the disease and treatment related to this organism. There are a few unfinished sections that need to be completed and put into full sentences.

Tone and balance: Tone is neutral.

Sources and references: Sources seem to be reliable scholarly references and are relatively current. There are three places of error within the references that need to be fixed before publishing.

Organization: After the lead and taxonomy the article has multiple sections that organizes the article, some sections are unfinished making it unclear.

Images and media: There is one image that represents the organism and follows the copyright regulations as the same picture is used on another published Wikipedia article.

Overall: What is written so far is good and detailed besides the unfinished sections. I would suggest adding a link to the 'irukandji syndrome' as there is another Wikipidedia page that also further explains it. Since there already is another article on the deadly syndrome I would focus more on the organism itself.