User:Sprygrocki/STEVE/Smildmo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

This seems to be a really good article that can use a lot of improvement. I recommend just making sure you plan everything properly and make sure all of the information fits in well with the existing article. Certain parts of the article, specifically the intro, could use some more detail to explain precisely what the phenomenon is.