User:Squamelia/Plankton/IHoversten Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Squamelia


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Squamelia/Plankton?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Plankton

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead has an odd attention getter that is not all-together factual and comes off as opinionated. Additionally, using a "we" statement is not a neutral tone of which should be used in wiki articles. The ending sentence of the lead does emphasize main points in the article, but should be stated differently.

The content added is relevant to the topic and has correct organization, from food web to specific interactions between members. It does lack interactions stated in the general food web paragraph, and could do with more content detailing these interactions. The information also lacks historical content, as well as content having to do with wikipedia's equity gap in terms of marine biologic advancement.

The content added is neutral and comes across as unbiased. Plankton are represented as one species in the latent paragraphs, but expressed in variation in the beginning. This causes a confusion which should be specified and explained.

Although sources are reliable and variant in terms of where they are derived from, there are only five total sources used which projects doubt on the total data's validity. The article also lacks images, although notes on the document claim later images will be added, and seem to the type of information lacking in the article.

The additions detailed in the article are important, as they specify food web interactions of plankton. After further expansion on what is stated, as well as the inclusion of more sources, this contribution would be very valuable.