User:Squiggl/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
AeroJames 01 Isatis

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am fascinated with aircraft and I wanted to find some obscure plane without a following so it wouldn't have a good Wikipedia page. My initial response to seeing the page was that there wasn't much, not even an image.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This page is concise and not much is said about the aircraft. This is reasonable because the plane was never actually put into construction, but I feel that the article could still be added too. I also don't believe this article has been edited in a while because the link to AeroJames in the first paragraph doesn't work. The last sentence in the introduction also doesn't make much sense and should be rewritten with more information about how and why the company selling this aircraft went under. I think that the specification section is good as there is not much to be said other than stating facts. I do think that there should be more of a "conclusion" area to discuss more about the history of the plane or even just add it to the first section. I also think that it would be beneficial for the look of the page to have some pictures added. Perhaps concept pictures or pictures of its debut flight? There also wasnt really anything on the talk page discussing what to do with this article. It is classified as a low-priority article and it is a very niche topic so I understand why. Other than those critiques, I don't believe there is much else needed for this article due to the nature of the topic.