User:Sridh120/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Mouse model of colorectal and intestinal cancer

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because model organisms are used to study conditions that may not be able to be studied in humans directly. Mouse models may be created to study numerous different diseases or conditions. The mouse model of colorectal and intestinal cancer is a specific mouse model used to study colorectal and intestinal cancer. The preliminary impression of the page was that it was organized into three main sections.

Evaluate the article
The lead section provides an overview of the topic and defines the key terms. The lead section does not contain content not included in the article but does not include a brief description of the article's sections. The content is relevant to the topic and up to date. It contains a balanced amount of information relevant to the topic. The article does not focus on targeting an equity gap or representing historically marginalized populations. The article is neutral overall and is scientific in nature. However, the article presents the use of these mouse models as "valuable" which may potentially catalyze readers towards making a conclusion about the topic, specifically that they are valuable. Other than that instance, the article generally uses a neutral tone and does not present a point of view. Underrepresented viewpoints could include those of animal rights activists who do not encourage the use of mouse or animal models in research. Statements are supported by sources. Sources are peer-reviewed publications and scientific articles. Sources are thorough and sampled links worked. However, many sources were published upwards of twenty years prior to the date of this review, so looking to supplement older sources with more recent and relevant research may be helpful. The writing quality is high and no grammatical or spelling errors were found. The article is well organized. No images and hence image captions or figure legends are present in this article. The overall status of the article is that it provides a foundation but could be further developed by adding images and figures as well as more relevant sources. Its grade as a C suggests improvement is needed. The article's strengths are that it is concise and contains relevant information that is well written and organized.