User:Sriracha0414/Spotted boxfish/RyanMontero Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Spotted Boxfish, Srirachao0414


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sriracha0414/Spotted_boxfish?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sriracha0414/Spotted_boxfish?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) What impressed me is the amount of info that's already inputted and it does look very nice, just need pictures because it does look kinda plain.
 * 4) Thank you so much! You're right, I do need to add a picture or multiple!
 * 5) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way?
 * 6) Very clear description
 * 7) Thank you so much! I still want to add some more details about the species.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 10) No, needs to change the format for the reference but the overall citations are good.
 * 11) I completely forgot to add the article sentence links! And I realized I forgot them a few days after I turned in my Article. But, thank you for the compliment on the citations.
 * 12) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about?
 * 13) Yes it does only.
 * 14) Thank you!
 * 15) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 16) NA
 * 17) There is a reference list at the bottom of the article, but I completely forgot to add the article links to each sentence, but I'll be adding those soon!
 * 18) What is the quality of the sources?
 * 19) Sources seen pretty good/average
 * 20) Thank you!
 * 21) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?
 * 22) Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 23) Add pictures
 * 24) I agree, I will be adding a couple of pictures to add some color and give my readers an idea of what the Spotted Boxfish looks like.
 * 25) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 26) Just the information needs to be more in depth and add a picture of the fish for the reader to better picture the species.
 * 27) I agree, I'll be doing both ASAP!
 * 28) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 29) Add a picture
 * 30) I will be adding a picture ASAP!
 * 31) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?
 * 32) I need to catch up on a lot of work.
 * 33) I need to as well, thank you for all your feedback! I appreciate it!