User:Srodriguez132/Kristy Sandoval/Akdjap Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Srodriguez132


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Srodriguez132/Kristy_Sandoval?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The first sentence clearly states what the article is going to be about. The lead talks about who the artist is and what kind of art she creates. The lead does not include information that is not located on the rest of the article. The lead is not overly detailed. The article provides the important aspects of the artist's life and career.

Content

The content of this article is relevant to the article as it provided all the details that are personal to the artist. The content is up to date of her latest art work. The content provided is relevant to the article. The article deals with a Chicana artist it could be said that Chicana artists are in the underrepresented topic.

Tone and Balance

The tone is quite neutral, it does not show a biased take on any of the information provided.

Sources and References

The article is missing citations after a fact. It was my understanding that quotes are not allowed on a wikipedia article. I see that one of the art is explained as a quote. I think the references are reliable as two are exhibitions and one is her personal website.

Organization

The article overall is clear and concise. There just needs to be a header to know that you are about to talk about her artwork.