User:Ssanborn94/sandbox

Article Evaluation

The article i chose for my evaluation was about the triumph Daytona 675. This is about a sports bike that i personally own and have a great deal of knowledge about but as i am biased about this bike i would not be a good editor when it came to writing a wiki page about the bike. The content is very well layed out and formatted. It starts out with the history of the bike and the origin story about the concept. It discusses the design and the concept behind the bike very well. The article then proceeds to go to the racing history and the dominance that the Japanese 600 cc bikes had before the 675 came along. It then goes to the revisions and model make overs of the bike and ends with the specks and information about the various years and models.

To me the tone of this article is on the verge of being one sided in the bikes favor. It addresses the bike and all of the information about the bike in a very well organized way to avoid being pro-Daytona and persuading.

The sources are manuals, bike magazines, but there are no scholarly articles on this subject as this is bike and there is not much to research. The information is displayed and published so the consumer has the information readily.