User:Ssanchezmm/Women's rugby league/Kumpf.Vanessa Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * I am reviewing Ssanchezmm's work
 * User:Ssanchezmm/Women's rugby league

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead is updated and has good information but it contains a lot of information about the game which i think could have a section in itself. Also it talks about the clubs and the organizations in this line "here are currently clubs for female-only participation running in Australia, Great Britain, and New Zealand which are overseen by the various individual organizations". I think it would be interesting to add information about the various clubs that are associated with these organizations.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
All the content added is relevant to the topic. There is good information in all the current sections. I think it would be good to have a section on how to lay Rugby, even if it is just a shortened version. Also information on the rugby clubs in the major organizations.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
Content in this article is neutral, and does not appear to be biased in anyway. There are no over represented viewpoints there is a good balance in this article.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and reference
Sources www.communityrugby.co.nz. Retrieved 2019-11-03 and USA Rugby. Retrieved 2019-11-03. Dont seem to work when clicked on, but the other 2 sources seem credible and reliable.

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
This article is organized pretty good. I think a few sections could be added pertaining to the actual game of rugby.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Overall I really enjoyed this article, simply because rugby is a sport that a lot of people in the United states forget about. especially women rugby. I do think there could be more information about the game itself, maybe rules of scrumming or the different positions that people play.