User:Sschriber/Ana María Cetto/Aserota2 Peer Review

General info
I am reviewing Sscriber
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Ana María Cetto
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ana María Cetto

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think the tone is very neutral which is good. There is no bias in any of the things added. The lead is not edited much but I do not think there needs to be much editing to it as the content added is just more information adding onto sentences that was not included previously. I think they also did a very good job at citing the sources they needed to and had reputable sources added. I think the content is relevant as there was just more added on to what she has done and details missing in the article that were added to it. I think they did a very good job at adding good content that was not there before even though there were no major changes or additions to the article. I also think it was well-written and all the added materials were written in a good tone for wikipedia. Overall, I believe they did a good job at filling in some gaps that were not there before and added good content with sources to back up the contributions.

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)