User:Ssegtf/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Mark of Toledo

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The translators who took Arabic/Islamic science and literature and translated it into Latin are very interesting. These translated works became a launch pad for European science and were invaluable to the genesis of modern western science and culture.

Evaluate the article
The Mark of Toledo wiki page is very clearly just a start. The lead section is only one sentence and leaves out some important info about Mark of Toledo. (His involvement in Islam and his translation work)

The content is very limited, there is some basic info, but not much. There are many questions left unanswered on Mark of Toledo, including his affiliations and life's work. Whether the content gap is from a lack of general knowledge on the subject, or because of a lack of research into what info may be available, I'm not sure. Mark of Toledo is considered a "notable person" in Islam (according to the editors of Wikipedia), so it seems that if more information was available on Mark of Toledo, then it would be found and included. If the reason for such limited information is because of a lack of historical information, then that should be stated in the article, not including that info leaves the reader wondering if this is all we know, or if Mark of Toledo is even real.

There are no media on the page. Some pictures of relevant books or paintings would be a nice contribution to the page.

Currently, there are no reliable sources, only a website with a broken link.

The talk page only has one entry, suggesting including the Mark of Toledo's Spanish name. According to the talk page, there are no plans to add or revise the page.