User:Ssha0495/sandbox

Gravitational biology -peer review

The article is well written, and of a good length. There are no grammatical or spelling errors. The lead section provides a comprehensive introduction and summary of the contents of the article. The contents of the article are somewhat verifiable. There are quite a few large sections of text which are not referenced. Could be improved by adding a few citations, especially in the 'Gravity and life elsewhere' heading. Apart from that, the article does not violate any copyright policies, and the citations that have been provided and reliable, peer-reviewed articles. The article addresses the main aspects of the topic and does not go into too much unnecessary detail. There are no biases or opinionated statements made in the article which gives it neutrality. On the article's Talk page, there are not any disputes and edit wars, simply some suggestion on improvement. Therefore, it is a relatively stable article. There is no image for the article, but this is understandable as gravitational biology is a concept which is difficult to illustrate in a single, simple image.