User:Sshockley1/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Green Woodworking
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article explains green wood and some basic ideas of how to work with it, but it lacks depth or interest in the wide variety of ways it can be done..
 * There is one source that is no longer functional.
 * The lead and the body are essentially tied together.
 * There is no info on the Talk page, but it seems like it was part of a WikiProject that has since closed or gone inactive.
 * The article is written neutrally and references other pages that are technique related.
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 2

 * Volkswagen Advertising
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article contains relevant information about the work produced for early VW ads, but the title implies that it will cover more than just that. It references the late 50's-60's but should be expanded to include more of the company's evolution as there is already another article that covers the campaigns in this article.
 * There is no lead and the article has little substance.
 * There are no images.
 * The article is written neutrally and references factual information.
 * Some sections go a while before referencing, but this is likely due to the whole section referring to one source.
 * Most sources appear to be clear except for two that are not complete, but when you click on links they are no longer active and need to be updated.
 * There are some entries on the Talk page, but no one seems interested in acting on improving this article.
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Sam Maloof
 * Article Evaluation
 * Contains relevant information about the artist, his background, personal life, and work.
 * There is a biographical lead and the article has substance.
 * There are several images.
 * The article is written neutrally and references factual information.
 * Some sections go a while before referencing, but this is likely due to the whole section referring to one source.
 * Most sources appear to be complete, but when some links are no longer active and need to be updated.
 * There are some entries on the Talk page citing some things that need improvement.
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Flourless Chocolate Cake
 * Article Evaluation
 * Contains relevant information but not very much of it.
 * There is no lead and the article has little substance.
 * There is an image.
 * The article is written neutrally and references factual information.
 * There are no sources.
 * This is part of a Wiki project, but there are no other entries on the talk page.
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Catherine Labonte
 * Article Evaluation
 * Contains relevant biographical information about about the artist, but nothing about her work.
 * The article has very little substance.
 * There are no images.
 * The article is written neutrally and references factual information.
 * Sources appear to be complete
 * The talk page is fairly empty but references that it would be of interest for WikiProjects
 * The talk page is fairly empty but references that it would be of interest for WikiProjects