User:Ssylviaiii/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (Chinese tea culture)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. Me and Mia are both come from China. We like tea and are interesting in that topic.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes. It describe the definition of Chinese tea culture and why it is necessary to write a whole page about it since Chinese tea culture is different from other country's tea culture.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes. It says that Chines tea culture is different from the preparation, taste, occasion and when it is consumed, And the major sections have list the details of those.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes. The article didn't mention how it is used it is used in traditional Chinese medicine as well as in Chinese cuisine.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I would say concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes it is. It describes almost every aspect of tea culture in China.
 * Is the content up-to-date? From my perspective, the Modern Culture section is not up-to-date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? In the end of the Lead section, it says Chines also use tea in medicine and cuisine. But I don't see details in the contents.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I don't see any.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? NO.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No, it only relies on a single resource.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The only one resource is quite completed and thorough.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The only link works.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is concise, clear and easy to read.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? There is barely grammatical or spelling errors.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? It is clearly broken down into sections.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes. It has beautiful images.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? I am not quite sure.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The conversation is about how to flourish the content by citing more resources.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It was rated as relies entirely on a single resource.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? I think its pretty much the same.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? The article's overall status might be a C-Class article.
 * What are the article's strengths? Medium I guess.
 * How can the article be improved? It can insert more information from multiple resources.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? I would say underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: