User:Ssylviaiii/Kungfu (restaurant)/Maw39 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Ssylviaiii
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ssylviaiii/Kungfu (restaurant)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? It still needs more up-to-date information.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? It needs to be more conclusive.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The article still needs to be expanded more.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? There is no content yet.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?There is no content yet.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The content is missing.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The content is missing now.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The view is neutral.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes the resources seem reliable.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The sources are thorough.
 * Are the sources current? The sources' date expand in 10 years.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes. They work.

Organization
Guiding questions: (The content is missing for now)


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The content needs to be added.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content is missing.
 * How can the content added be improved? The content can be improved by focusing on several topics.