User:St3ffsK/House of CB/Smaxine1 Peer Review

General info
St3ffsK
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:St3ffsK/House of CB:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * House of CB:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall the draft is well written and effective brand evolution description for the topic. I appreciate the use of numbers and data to support the evident growth of the company. Additionally, the added content is useful information for readers to better understand the evolution and development of House of CB.

Lead


 * The lead of the story has not been updated, but there was an added subsection to the article called "Brand Evolution." I appreciate the content and information provided in this new subsection. However, the lead was not included in the edits, but I don't think the lead needs to be edited too much in the future.
 * The current lead is a well written and descriptive part of the article that is already there. I think the lead could use more structure to further describe the following subtopics and layout of the article.

Content


 * The content added in the "Brand Evolution" section is highly relevant to the overall topic because it provides further background information. I think the content for brand evolution could go further in depth about specific points in time that helped develop the company. So far there it's mostly a broad overview of brand evolution, but I think it could use more specifics. The content added is up to date and necessary for the article.
 * This article does not discuss equity gaps or misinformation for marginalized communities.

Tone and Balance


 * The tone and balance of the content added is mostly neutral and unbiased. However there is a lot of information about the founder, Conna Walker, which may not be fully relevant to this subsection. I believe if the information mostly discusses Walker, there could be an additional subsection dedicated to Walker, which could be titled "Founder of House of CB." Walker's viewpoint seems to be the main point of discussion throughout the added content, which may underrepresent others involved in the creation of House of CB.

Sources and References


 * Most of the sources and references used in the article are news sources such as Hollywood Reporter, The Standard, and Fashion Bomb Daily. However there is a good use of other references including reliable sources such as Forbes. Each of the source links works and are relevant to the topic. I think research on varying authors and available literature could be increased to diversify the range of sources.

Organization


 * The organization of the article is well structured because it goes from a lead to history to brand evolution. I didn't see any grammatical errors or spelling typos. Overall the content is concise and well written for readers to understand and comprehend.

Images and Media


 * No additional images or media were used