User:StaciLeila/sandbox

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Yes, everything in this article is relevant to the topic of aging. It discusses what aging is, the effects of it, what it is based on, and many other factors that come into play concerning the issue of aging.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Not in my opinion. I feel that the article does a good job at conveying information, while also being sure to exclude any biased representations. It just presents a lot of facts.

Check a few citations (hint: focus on the section about Sociology). Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Where do the citations come from? All of the links in the Sociology section are functioning properly. For the most part the sources support the claims in the article but I think the author could have made the connection a little stronger.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Most of them are pretty reliable but, there are a few that could be backed with more credible sources.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? The information provided seems to go right along with what I've been learning about aging in school thus far, and evidence is provided. So the information is up to date. But of course, knowledge of this topic is always growing.

Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are no conversations on the talk page concerning the issue of how to represent this topic. The only thing someone did was make a suggestion about altering the spelling of the title of the article.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is rated as B-class, meaning it is one step away from being "complete" (which is an A class rating). It is a part of the following Wikiprojects:

WikiProject Ageing and culture WikiProject Biology WikiProject Health and fitness WikiProject Medicine WikiProject World's Oldest People Wikiproject Sociology

ARTICLE PROPOSAL (2 Potential Topics Related to Ageing or Sociology)

Article 1: Sexuality in Older Age (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexuality_in_older_age ) Areas to improve in article: •	Does not have reliable sources •	The subtopics are mundane, and should be changed to other topics that encompass the most important points about sexuality and what happens to senses of sexuality as we age •	Each subtopic could have provided more relevant information to the topic •	There should possibly be a section about a survey of how many older people feel about participating in the act of sex, and why they feel that way. What life issues make older people less inclined to have higher interest in sexual activity? Notes of Observation/Improvement •	A part of the Wikiproject “Sexuality”, “Start class” scale rating, “low” importance scale rating Article 2: Fertility (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertility) Areas to improve in articles: •	Add a section discussing the causes of infertility in humans •	Add to the “Fertility Biology” section and discuss the importance that diet can have on infertility; it is on mentioned, but not expanded upon in this article. Notes of Observation/Improvement •	A part of the Wikiproject “Sociology”, C-Class quality scale, has not yet received a rating as far as where the article lies on the importance scale. •	The title “Fertility” is very broad and I feel that it would be better if it was at the very least changed to Human Fertility, since only humans are discussed. •	More credible sources needed
 * Article 1 – is my preferred subject.*