User:Stacyargueta/Allergy test/Amart764 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Stacyargueta
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Allergy test

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, it is clear and states the purpose of their article.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Not specifically, but it does allude to it.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, it served as an umbrella.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, it is about allergy testing- reasons, explanations and examples are given.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, sources are recent.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, there is no opinion.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, it is very straight forward.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, there is an introduction and then an analysis.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, it is just explanatory.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, but maybe a header or subsection title can be added.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * More detail has been given.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Continue explanations in different parts of allergy testing field, maybe protocols for example. Author can add table of contents and sections.