User:Starfish1829/Mytilopsis sallei/Sophiamarinebio Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Usernames: Elianarb & Starfish1829


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Starfish1829/Mytilopsis sallei
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mytilopsis sallei

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, your article is concise, clear, and super easy to read. I think that you did a really good job in addressing important points. The Lead is concise, but maybe you add a brief description of the article’s major sections in it. In terms of the way you organized your paper, I would maybe consider moving the taxonomy section closer to the top of the page. I think that it would make more sense to move this section after or before your anatomy and morphology section. In both sections, you mention the highly variable shell morphology, so I think it would flow better if the two sections are closer together. Also, in your taxonomy section you mention that many of the seven species are synonyms of each other. Maybe you could give an example of this and also briefly mention what the seven species are. Also, I would consider maybe taking the last portion of your habitat and distribution section and making new section that has to do with ecosystem damage and they have caused. This section should be located near your conservation status section or even added to it because you mention the efforts that were taken to control the species.