User:Starryberry/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Pink-collar worker

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose this article because I have heard of the term "blue collar worker" and was interested in seeing why and how might pink collar worker related to feminism. The content of the article matters because it explains how certain jobs such as being a secretary became associated with women within the United States. My first impression of the article was how well-written it was.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section includes a concise, short description of the main concepts of the article. All of the article's components are relevant and up to date as one of the recent statistics are from 2016. The article would be neutral since it provides the historical use of the term while explaining how women and men have been impacted by the pink collar workplace. However, the article does not address if this term or experience is also relevant in other countries and would benefit if the lead section included the country of relevance. The sources are backed by secondary sources of relevant information with working links and sources from different journal and statistics. The article is well-written but needs to be more clear about the impacts of the term. On the talk page, the article is a part of Wiki-Foundation-supported course assignment and the commenters ask for the article to be more neutral and specific. All of the images are captioned. The article is developed but could be further clarified.