User:Starryberry/Sheila Ortiz Taylor/BlondePink Peer Review

General info
Starryberry
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Starryberry/Sheila Ortiz Taylor
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
For the lead, I would suggest adding at least one sentence making it clear that her writings made an impact. The last few sentences of the "Faultline" section are really powerful. Is there any evidence on if her work about redefining what a family can look like activated a specific movement or influenced/led to something specific? The "Other Written Works" section is efficient and to the point, that's good. The "LGBTQ+" section dives deep into how her work applies to society which is really important. I think it could be beneficial to put an analytical sentence like that in the lead, to show how her writings contributed to society, which you will elaborate on later. The "Chicana Identity" section is well written, no notes on that. The "Career" section seems a little short, unless there is no other information on that. Also it might make more sense to put the "Career" section below "Early Life" section, but also the end is fine too because it is a slight summary. Just an idea, both work. All source references are well done, as well as the tone. The only other thing I would suggest is to look into the grammar, I noticed each section wrote the names of books differently (italicized, quoted, regular). Great job overall!