User:Starwarsfan6/Ontogeny/Uketbriana Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Starwarsfan6


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Starwarsfan6/Ontogeny


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:Starwarsfan6/Ontogeny

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

So far this wiki page is quite clear. Really good background information on the development of Ontogeny. The detailing on Haeckel is very informative. However, more information on the methods Haeckel completed to compose his findings would allow a better understanding of how and why this is vital and important. More information on Ontogeny would also be more helpful. The lead is overall very clear and concise. The content added to this document is relevant to the topic. The tone of this article thus far is very neutral, do not include a particular tone. Thus far the sources are up to date and are cited very well. The links work as well. Written well, very clear, and concise. A very few grammatical errors, however overall very good writing. No images were added.

Response: Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it. I plan on adding more images when I get to the developmental stages section and I'm going to add more on Ontogeny later in the page. About the point you made about Haeckel's methods - I think it would be good to touch on it but I don't want to make the article about how he figured everything out, just to mention his significance with Ontogeny.