User:Stazlouken/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Lead section
The lead section offers a clear description of PrEP for HIV prevention, however the first two paragraphs offer very similar information. Some of the citations and information is >2 years old and may need to be updated. The Lead section may also need to be revised to incorporate brief descriptions of the article's major sections, as it only includes a definition of PrEP and various FDA-approved drugs.

Content

 * The article content is relevant to the topic. It includes research, side effects, and societal/cultural views on the subject. There appears to be some sections that require updated citations, particularly the "Access and Adoption" section and portions of the "Research" section.
 * The "Other Countries" section of the article lists countries that currently have guidelines for PrEP but do not explain in detail what those guidelines are.
 * The "Research" section is missing multiple medical citations.
 * This article discusses access/pricing of PrEP and incorporates the health care disparities of specific groups such as men who have sex with men.
 * There are a lot of new secondary sources published in the past 2 years that incorporate more diverse patient populations and accessibility to PrEP that would need to be updated in the current wiki article.

Tone and Balance

 * The article has a neutral tone. There may be need to revise the "Politics and Culture" section to incorporate more relevant and updated information, including change of wording for some phrases. There may also be an underrepresentation of people who identify as transgendered and/or non-binary in this section. However, the article does not appear to persuade the reader to favor one position.
 * Many new systematic reviews have come out in the past few years incorporating a broader patient populations. Applying these secondary sources may help with the current tone on the article.

Sources and References

 * The article provides reliable sources of information, however, I plan to incorporate more secondary sources. In addition, some areas may need to be updated with current information.

Organization and writing quality
The writing of the article is clear with minimal grammatical errors. It is well-organized and broken down into sections. There may be need to update the article in certain areas to make it easier to read/more concise.

Images and Media
The article provides images and tables, but some areas may need to be updated with current statistics.
 * Sources:- Sun Z, Gu Q, Dai Y, et al. Increasing awareness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and willingness to use HIV PrEP among men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global data. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(3):e25883. doi:10.1002/jia2.25883::- Desai M, Field N, Grant R, McCormack S. Recent advances in pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. BMJ. 2017;359:j5011. Published 2017 Dec 11. doi:10.1136/bmj.j5011:- Yuan D, Yin Y, Chen J, et al. Acceptability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J STD AIDS. 2022;33(3):218-231. doi:10.1177/09564624211042308::- O Murchu E, Marshall L, Teljeur C, et al. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations. BMJ Open. 2022;12(5):e048478. Published 2022 May 11. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048478::- Edeza A, Karina Santamaria E, Valente PK, Gomez A, Ogunbajo A, Biello K. Experienced barriers to adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among MSM: a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies. AIDS Care. 2021;33(6):697-705. doi:10.1080/09540121.2020.1778628::- Jin G, Shi H, Du J, et al. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care Continuum for HIV Risk Populations: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2023;37(12):583-615. doi:10.1089/apc.2023.0158:- Ruppe LB, Spencer LA, Kriebs JM. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Infection and the Role of the Women's Health Care Provider in HIV Prevention. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021;66(3):322-333. doi:10.1111/jmwh.13231::-Cheek JB, Feldman MB, Montero N, Gambone GF, Hoffman S, Blackstock OJ. Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Initiation Among Black and Latina Cisgender Women Receiving HIV Prevention Care Coordination Services in New York City. AIDS Behav. 2022;26(10):3174-3184. doi:10.1007/s10461-022-03661-1

Lead section
The lead section provides a clear definition of prison healthcare, but can also include other words to describe it such as "correctional healthcare." It does not include a brief summary of the articles main points/subheadings.

Content

 * I think the article does a great job at including the history of prison healthcare. However, there needs to be updates with current articles published in the past few years. In addition, there is very little regarding following imprisonment and what current resources are available for people who were in prison.
 * There may be need to update the "Countries" section to incorporate more information within various other countries apart from the US, UK and Ghana.
 * I think a good section to add would be regarding juvenile incarceration. There are multiple recent articles about this topic and it would allow a broader scope of incarceration healthcare.
 * It may be beneficial to also add these healthcare topics/needs specifically:
 * pregnancy and childbirth
 * Opioid use and MAT
 * Aging healthcare
 * Acute care (TBIs, infections, wounds, etc)

Tone and Balance

 * A majority of the article has neutral tone but there are parts of the Ethics and Rights section that appear to have portions without citations and without credible sources.

Sources and References

 * The article provides reliable information, but these will need to be updated with more secondary sources. Many of the sources do not appear to be meta-analyses or systematic reviews.

Organization and writing quality
The writing of the article is clear but I believe some portions can be more concise.

Images and Media
The article provides minimal images with one image that seems out of place without much relation to the article's content. I would like to add more relevant images and tables to showcase current data from secondary sources. - Barnert E, Sun A, Abrams LS, Chung PJ. Physical Health, Medical Care Access, and Medical Insurance Coverage of Youth Returning Home After Incarceration: A Systematic Review. J Correct Health Care. 2020;26(2):113-128. doi:10.1177/1078345820915908
 * Sources

- Barnert E, Sun A, Abrams LS, Chung PJ. Physical Health, Medical Care Access, and Medical Insurance Coverage of Youth Returning Home After Incarceration: A Systematic Review. J Correct Health Care. 2020;26(2):113-128. doi:10.1177/1078345820915908

- Son J, Miller WM, Tossone K, Butcher F, Kuo K. The Effect of Interprofessional Student-Led Reproductive Health Education on Youths in Juvenile Detention. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(3):370-375. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2016.11.002

- Barnert ES, Perry R, Morris RE. Juvenile Incarceration and Health. Acad Pediatr. 2016;16(2):99-109. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2015.09.004

- Kirubarajan A, Tsang J, Dong S, et al. Pregnancy and childbirth during incarceration: A qualitative systematic review of lived experiences. BJOG. 2022;129(9):1460-1472. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17137

- Addison HA, Richmond TS, Lewis LM, Jacoby S. Mental health outcomes in formerly incarcerated Black men: A systematic mixed studies review. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(7):1851-1869. doi:10.1111/jan.15235

- Durand E, Chevignard M, Ruet A, Dereix A, Jourdan C, Pradat-Diehl P. History of traumatic brain injury in prison populations: A systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;60(2):95-101. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2017.02.003

- Bi-Mohammed Z, Wright NM, Hearty P, King N, Gavin H. Prescription opioid abuse in prison settings: A systematic review of prevalence, practice and treatment responses. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;171:122-131. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.032

- Komalasari R, Wilson S, Haw S. A systematic review of qualitative evidence on barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) programmes in prisons. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;87:102978. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102978

- Hedrich D, Alves P, Farrell M, Stöver H, Møller L, Mayet S. The effectiveness of opioid maintenance treatment in prison settings: a systematic review. Addiction. 2012;107(3):501-517. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03676.x

- Alirezaei S, Latifnejad Roudsari R. The Needs of Incarcerated Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review of Literature. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2022;10(1):2-17. doi:10.30476/IJCBNM.2021.89508.1613

- Stevens BA, Shaw R, Bewert P, Salt M, Alexander R, Loo Gee B. Systematic review of aged care interventions for older prisoners. Australas J Ageing. 2018;37(1):34-42. doi:10.1111/ajag.12484