User:Stbraswe/Agudar/Darthrevan2023 Peer Review

The article has a neutral tone. Its concise and straight to the point. I suggest adding more content since the article is a little short. There are enough sources to add more content. Good list of sources.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)