User:Steelcaveman/Rock Church (Auburn, Wyoming)/Kenna61 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Steelcaveman


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Rock Church (Auburn, Wyoming)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead of the article is the only section it has. It does contain some good information that informs you about the building. I think some of the information could be made into a new section, such as background to be able to extend the length and organize the information.

Content

The article does contain relevant information about the building and is up to date.

Tone and Balance

There doesn't seem to be a bias tone. The article states the information based more on the background and current usage of the building.

Sources and References

The references are reliable and are trusted unbiased sources. All the links work and direct you to the corresponding sites. The related linked Wikipedia articles are relevant to the topic and can give further depth into related topics about the building.

Organization

There are no spelling or grammatical errors that I see within the article. I think there could be another section or two added to the article to further break it down into more specific questions. The information within the article is organized well for being in a single paragraph.

Images and Media

There is an image which is on the National Historic Register. I am unsure if this image is under copyright or not. The NHR states that the copyright is up to the individual original owner of the images. It is linked though and is captioned appropriately.

Overall

I do think the article was strengthened and useful information was added. I think more individual sections could be added, but I acknowledge the limits of that because it is a smaller building in Wyoming.