User:Steeldanguy788/Ostracism/MinervaNix Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Steeldanguy788


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Steeldanguy788/Ostracism?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ostracism

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:


 * The lead tells the reader, what the article is about. It did not need to be edited.

Content:


 * The content added is well written and relevant to the topic. The content added was to help fill in the small pieces from the original and to add more citations to the original article.

Tone and Balance:


 * The content added is neutral from what I can tell and there is no claims that appear heavily biased towards a position.

Sources and References:


 * I could not find the sources that you added to the article, but I’m sure they are reliable especially if you used the schools’ library or other scholarly sources.

Organization:


 * Organization is well done; I think it was a good idea not to mess with the original formatting of the article.

Images and Media:


 * Image of Greek Ostracon close up, will help readers to see the details of what was written on this ostracons.

Overall Impression:


 * From what I could tell not much was needed to be added to the main article. I think it is a good thing that you are checking and added citations to the main content. I liked that you added the close up image of the ostracon it allows for more details to stand out, something that is difficult to see with the other image above.