User:Stellasuperba/Predatory advertising /Luckyclover44 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Stellasuperba


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Stellasuperba/Predatory advertising


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Predatory advertising

Lead

 * Currently there is no lead to the article, although the first section "Predatory Advertising" looks like it has the content of a lead.
 * The first section does outline the remaining sections of the article
 * It includes a concise and relevant introductory sentence
 * It does not include information that's not in the article
 * It is concise and not overly detailed

Content

 * Content added is relevant to the topic
 * Content is up to date

Tone and Balance

 * Content is neutral
 * No biased, overrepresented, or underrepresented views
 * No persuasion

Sources and References

 * Sources are diverse and reliable
 * I would suggest linking to more Wikipedia articles

Organization

 * Article is well-organized and structured
 * Very minor spelling or grammatical errors, copyediting stuff
 * persons --> person's under "Motivational vulnerability"
 * unfavorable transaction --> a unfavorable transaction or make plural under "social vulnerability"
 * individuals --> individual's, limits --> limit under "economic vulnerability."
 * that --> than under "omission."
 * law suit --> lawsuit under "for-profit colleges"
 * Small typo: "Congress" is lowercase near the end of the first paragraph under "Legislative measures."

Overall
Great job! I really enjoyed reading your article draft. The content was really interesting and the article was very well-written!