User:Steminist04/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I'm evaluating the Wikipedia page "Environmental Policy of the Joe Biden Administration"

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this one because climate change is highly relevant to this course, and this is a topic I am personally interested in.

Evaluate the article

 * The lead of this article is not a very strong summary of the overall Wikipedia page. It discusses very little of the Biden Administration's Policy toward the environment, and instead references a few viewpoints of the policy.
 * There is information referenced in the lead that is not included elsewhere in the article.
 * There are quite a few sections missing sources, although the information does appear to be accurate. There are a few places with uncited quotes.
 * Viewpoints: this article does good job including different viewpoints and reactions to the policy and actions taken. I think including the entire "Reactions" section was beneficial to the article.
 * Writing Styles: The overall tone of this article reads a bit like a magazine article, instead of an encyclopedia entry. The English grammar and usage is a bit clunky in places, with odd flips between present and past tense. There are a few sections that read more like opinion than complete fact.
 * The article contains to visuals or media.
 * There is not very much on the talk page.
 * Overall, this article has very good bones and foundation, it just needs a good edit to get it up to the expectations of a strong Wikipedia page. The content is strong, the tone and styling is what needs to be changed.
 * The most immediate edit that should be made is to make a lead section that more appropriately summarizes the article.