User:Steph.tsaii/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1
Article title: Chengcing Lake

Article Evaluation:
Lead Section


 * The lead section included an introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic
 * It does not include a brief introduction of the article's major sections
 * Could introduce more information in the lead

Content


 * Needs to work on content by adding more information
 * Only includes "Parks and Aquarium" for the section, which is not correct
 * Did not include content like history, sites, ecology and conversation, transportation, and park hours
 * Did not include a detailed list of lake (primary inflows and outflows, surface depth, and surface elevation)

Tone and Balance


 * The article is neutral. There is no bias.

Sources and References


 * One link is not working and not there (Bridge of Nine Turns)

Organization and writing quality


 * The article is not well-written. It is not clear and concise
 * There are not grammatical or spelling errors
 * The article is not well organized. The section does not represent its major points of the topic

Images and Media


 * Include images that contribute to the understanding of the topic
 * There are only two images but they are laid out in a pleasing way

Talk Page Discussion


 * One user added three external links and asked to review the edit
 * The article is part of the WikiProject Taiwan to improve coverage of Taiwan
 * The article is rated stub for its quality and low importance.

Overall Impressions


 * There is only one section in the article, which is not enough
 * There could be more elaboration done on the history part
 * There should be more information of the scenics and park resources
 * This article is poorly developed as it is only giving a very brief summary of the lake
 * There could be more images included

Option 2
Article title: National Kaohsiung Center for the Arts

Article Evaluation:
Lead Section


 * The lead section only included where the National Kaohsiung Center for the Arts
 * There are no brief description of the article's major sections

Content


 * The article's content is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date
 * There are some content missing

Tone and Balance


 * The article is neutral and not biased
 * It did not mention the importance of this architecture to Kaohsiung

Sources and References


 * There could be more helpful links provided in the Transportation section
 * All sources works
 * Some sources does not explain the history well

Organization and Writing Quality


 * The article is well-written with clear description
 * There are no grammatical or spelling errors
 * The article did not include all important sections of the topic

Images and Media


 * The gallery provides a lot of images of the architecture
 * The images are not well-captioned with many appeared to be the same description
 * The images laid out are not visually appealing (different sizes)

Take Page Discussion


 * There is no activity on the Talk page

Overall Impressions


 * The article is rated as Sub-class with low importance
 * It is part of the WikiProject Taiwan
 * The lead section lacks a lot of information
 * The article could be improved by including the contributors of the architecture, its ranking in Taiwan, and a well-written history timeline of the art center
 * There should be a detailed paragraph for each theater and music hall
 * Match the sizing of the images in the Gallery and change their captions

Option 3
Article title: Rainbow Village

Article Evaluation:
Lead Section


 * The lead section only provided information of where Rainbow Village is
 * There are no brief description of the article's major sections

Content


 * The article's content is relevant to the topic
 * The content is not up-to-date
 * There is missing content (e.g. founder, paintings, updated news)
 * Should explain what the military dependents' village was like

Tone and Balance


 * The article is neutral and not biased

Sources and References


 * All sources are working
 * Only two reference links with one not working
 * One of the reference link is from a news site

Images and Media


 * Only two images in the article with weak caption
 * Should include more images that shows the paintings

Talk Page Discussion


 * There is no activity in the Talk page

Overall Impressions


 * The article is ranked Sub-class for quality with low importance
 * The history subsection is pretty well-developed
 * There should be more subsections
 * The Transportation subsection could be more detailed
 * There should be more images of the paintings

Option 4

 * Article title:
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources