User:StephaniePaventy/Zoe-Vonna Palmrose/Cirith Ninniach Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

StephaniePaventy


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:StephaniePaventy/Zoe-Vonna Palmrose - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: this looks good so far; nice introductory sentence. You could add a few more sentences but it doesn't need to be much longer.

Content: the content is relevant, and it looks like you're planning to add more information, which is a good idea.

Tone and Balance: one sentence, "Palmrose is prominent and reputable for her professionalism in the accounting field", could be seen as biased/not neutral. The rest of the article is written in a neutral tone, however.

Sources and References: there could be more citations but again it seems like you plan to add more.

Organization: the sections you have so far make sense and are well-organized. If you can find enough information, you could add a section on "early life" or something like that, but since this is a living person you definitely don't have to.

Overall, the article needs more information added, but what you have so far is good information. Some suggestions I have are to add links to other Wikipedia articles for some terms: "chief accountant" and "audit-related debate" were terms I had not seen before. Also, instead of listing articles, you could write about what topics her articles cover. Same with awards - instead of a list, format as a paragraph. Otherwise this is a great start to the article, and an interesting topic! Great job! :)