User:Stephaniegrisolia/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Personal knowledge networking


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article provides a brief description of personal knowledge networking, however it requires major editing, the citations need vitrification and Wikipedia has flagged it for promoting the subject in a subjective manner rather than a neutral opinion.


 * Sources
 * All of the sources used in the article are outdated, with the most recent being from 2006

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Sociomapping


 * Article Evaluation
 * At first glance the article seems to contain all the essential components to grasp an understanding of sociomapping, however the article is flagged for containing a sponsorship or advertisements. An advertisement in a Wikipedia is a violation and inflicts on Wikipedia's neutral policy.


 * Sources
 * Reference are lacking reliability

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Small-world experiment


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article explains small-world experiment in detail with adequate structure to make it concise. The article was flagged for its lack of verified citations, which are crucial for the reliability of a Wikipedia page


 * Sources
 * References need to be verified

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Happier (social network)


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article is brief and only contains a definition of happier (social network), however this definition is a good start if someone wanted to research how to have a happier social network. A key exponent that is missing from this article is that it does not have links to any other articles, by adding those links it will allow Wikipedia users to better understand the topic and further their research.


 * Sources
 * No links to other articles or references

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Viral message


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article gets the point across, however the lack of sources is apparent and destroys any credibility the article could have had.


 * Sources
 * There are no sources for this article, which discredits all of the writing that was done