User:Stevenzhang4949/Cultural imperialism/Ali.panta Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Stevenzhang4949
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Stevenzhang4949/Cultural imperialism

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? N/A

Lead evaluation
Needs to add leads to reflect new content. Remember to start by giving the definition of cultural imperialism. After defining cultural imperialism you can add the term globalization to its definition.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes

Content evaluation
You can include the definition of imperialism and give examples from the past. Other than that, the content seems informative.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Yes
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Yes
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Yes, slightly

Tone and balance evaluation
It seems like the content you have is trying to persuade the reader against cultural imperialism instead of only define it. Wikipedia is limited to define terms rather than demonstrate a position.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? N/A

Sources and references evaluation
It is necessary to add more sources to support the content.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It needs to improve
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No

Organization evaluation
When updating the article it will necessary to break down the content into section that reflect the major points.Add a header that reflects the comparison between globalization and cultural imperialism. Also, another header can be about cultural imperialism and commerce.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media N/A


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
Add images about authors related to the definition of cultural imperialism. For example, add a picture of the person who coined the term, if any.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It gives a better perspective about cultural imperialism. Globalization helps to the definition and commerce gives a better example.
 * How can the content added be improved? By organizing the information better.

Overall evaluation
The information added is relevant for the definition of cultural imperialism. It is necessary to organize the content and to add more sources. Also, it is important to avoid having a position against cultural imperialism, I know it can be hard since it is a negative term, but on Wikipedia we are only limited to define the term and add examples.