User:Stevicks835/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Addictive personality - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen to evaluate this article because it closely relates to me which would cause me to have background knowledge of the subject. I have family members on both sides that have had problems with addiction and an older brother who still suffers from this problem. This leads me to have a close connection to this article and helps me understand more on the subject while being able to give my own knowledge.

Evaluate the article
The introductory sentence clearly states the articles topic. For the most part the lead is concise but starts to get into information about topics that could be later explained in the part of the articles relating to that topic. A brief description is included to give an introduction to each topic. All the information in the lead is included and better explain in later in the article. In the lead the end starts to be overly detailed which can be moved to the part of the article those topics are discussed in.

All the content in the article directly relates to the topic of the article. All the content in each section seems to be up to date relating to the article. All the content is nicely explained and has no consent that is not related to the topic. I feel that most people are aware of addictive personalities and there is much information relating to topic causing it to not be underrepresented.

The article does not over represent one side causing over another cause it to neutral. Each different subtopic of the article is actually described all has adequate information describing it. Neither side has less information nor is overrepresented.

All the information in the article is backed up by reliable sources. There are many diverse sources giving many different aspects. The links to the sources work adding to the creditability.

The article has some extra information that may cause confusion but for the most part is clear and concise. Some of the data can be hard to follow such as t group of users of illicit drugs differs from the group of non-users for N, O, A, C, Imp, and SS that is illustrated. This could be better explained so it is easier for a beginner to understand. The topics are well broken down and easy to understand.

The article shows lists of data that help understand aspects of the article better. It is included in the end which adds to the appeal of the article. Other than that, no other imagery is shown.

This article is in the Wik projects rated class C. In the Talk it discusses grammatical errors and places to add to the article causing it to be easier to read.

Overall the article is easy to read and is visually pleasing. it describes each subtopic well is accurately expressed leading it to be neutral overall.