User:Stickystingray/Resilience of coral reefs/Zoo8796 Peer Review

General info
Stickystingray
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Stickystingray/Resilience of coral reefs
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Resilience of coral reefs

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: No updates to lead done. Lead is fairly good as is but could have another source and point to it about overfishing and anchoring to cover the new content that was added. I feel as if the redundancy is not a big deal and some simple re-wording could help it feel more fluid.

Content: Relevant and up to date. No missing information. Content added fixes a information gap involving overfishing and anchoring which were not directly mentioned in lead. Section about Natural Disturbances was a good add to also fix a gap that was introduced in lead but not covered. Content does not deal with an equity gap.

Tone and Balance: Tone is neutral, unbiased, and purely informational.

Sources and References: References are very fitting and integrated into content well. If lead is updated, another citation/source might be needed. most sources added are fairly recent except one from 1994 and one from 2010. Both provided needed information so I think they are ok to keep. All links work.

Images and Media: no added images or media.

Overall Impressions: Great job! I think you have done very well updating and professionalizing your chosen article. It seems like you put a lot of time, thought and hard work into your additions.

-Zoo8796