User:Stolp.micah/Janet McCloud/Vicaccinoprime Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Stolp.micah/Janet McCloud/Vicaccinoprime Peer Review


 * Use
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Stolp.micah/Janet McCloud
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Janet McCloud

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Does the Lead include a an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topics?
 * The Lead does include a good introductory sentence that introduces the articles topic: Janet McCloud
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * There is no content that is missing or that does not belong. The content is relevant to the article's topic.
 * Is the content added neutral?
 * The content is fairly neutral. It could be argued that having direct quotes and perspectives from people in McCloud's life are potentially biased. I would be careful having too much information from these people.
 * Are the sources current?
 * A good chunk of the sources are current. However, there are some that are over twenty years old. While there may be some good information in these sources, make sure that the information is not outdated from the articles themselves.
 * Is the content added well written?
 * For the most part, the added content is well written. There are a few typos and grammatical errors throughout, so extra proofreading could be beneficial.
 * Is the article more complete?
 * The article is significantly more complete. There is more information in each section, which helps the overall content of the article.